Put simply, nearly all relevant video recordings are admissible as evidence in your divorce, but you might pay a steep price for the evidence if you violate commonsense rules of propriety.Ģ) Guardian ad Litem. Unreasonably monitoring your spouse could also be construed as stalking. Someone might turn around and sue you for invasion of privacy. Or if you spouse is hallucinating on meth, make a video-only recording.īut do not assume you can get away with putting a camera in places you intuitively know you should not, such as in a bathroom or changing area. If your spouse throws a tantrum in front of Walmart’s security cameras, get the footage. Arguably so are most cell-phone-video recordings if the sound is turned off. Surveillance video is usually admissible in a divorce so long as it is relevant. The primary rules banning recordings as evidence – RCW 9.73.030 and. The following are common exceptions to these rules:ġ) Video Recordings. In turn, RCW 9.73.050 bans courts from admitting these illegal recordings as evidence in criminal and civil cases, including divorces and other types of custody battles. The applicable statute – RCW 9.73.030 – makes most types of audio recordings illegal. Washington is a “two-party consent” state, meaning you need the speaker’s permission to record a private conversation. Generally no, though there are many exceptions. Darling, Divorce attorney at Genesis Law FirmĬan I use a recording of my spouse in my Washington divorce?
0 kommentar(er)
